⚠️ CVE-2025-25427: A Stored cross-site scripting ... ⚠️ CVE-2025-3509: A Remote Code Execution (RCE) ... ⚠️ CVE-2025-3246: An improper neutralization of ... 🟡 CVE-2025-3124: A missing authorization vulner... 🟢 CVE-2024-42178: HCL MyXalytics is affected by ... 🟡 CVE-2025-3765: A vulnerability, which was cla... 🟡 CVE-2025-3764: A vulnerability classified as ... 🟢 CVE-2024-42177: HCL MyXalytics is affected by ... 🟡 CVE-2025-3763: A vulnerability classified as ... 🟡 CVE-2025-3762: A vulnerability was found in P... 🟡 CVE-2025-29722: A CSRF vulnerability in Commer... 🟡 CVE-2025-28101: An arbitrary file deletion vul... 🔥 CVE-2025-28009: A SQL Injection vulnerability ... 🟢 CVE-2025-26269: DragonflyDB Dragonfly through ... 🟢 CVE-2025-26268: DragonflyDB Dragonfly before 1... ⚠️ CVE-2024-55211: An issue in Think Router Tk-Rt... 🟢 CVE-2021-47671: In the Linux kernel, the follo... ⚠️ CVE-2021-47670: In the Linux kernel, the follo... ⚠️ CVE-2021-47669: In the Linux kernel, the follo... ⚠️ CVE-2021-47668: In the Linux kernel, the follo... 🟢 CVE-2025-32415: In libxml2 before 2.13.8 and 2... ⚠️ CVE-2025-2947: IBM i 7.6  contains a privile... ⚠️ CVE-2025-29661: Litepubl CMS <= 7.0.9 is vulne... ⚠️ CVE-2025-29181: FOXCMS <= V1.25 is vulnerable ... ⚠️ CVE-2025-29180: In FOXCMS <=1.25, the installd... ⚠️ CVE-2025-29039: An issue in dlink DIR 832x 240... ⚠️ CVE-2025-43015: In JetBrains RubyMine before 2... 🟡 CVE-2025-43014: In JetBrains Toolbox App befor... 🟡 CVE-2025-43013: In JetBrains Toolbox App befor... ⚠️ CVE-2025-43012: In JetBrains Toolbox App befor... 🟡 CVE-2025-42921: In JetBrains Toolbox App befor... 🔥 CVE-2025-39596: Weak Authentication vulnerabil... 🔥 CVE-2025-39595: Improper Neutralization of Spe... ⚠️ CVE-2025-39594: Improper Neutralization of Inp... 🔥 CVE-2025-39588: Deserialization of Untrusted D... 🔥 CVE-2025-39587: Improper Neutralization of Spe... ⚠️ CVE-2025-39586: Improper Neutralization of Spe... ⚠️ CVE-2025-39583: Missing Authorization vulnerab... 🟡 CVE-2025-39580: Missing Authorization vulnerab... ⚠️ CVE-2025-39569: Improper Neutralization of Spe... ⚠️ CVE-2025-39568: Improper Limitation of a Pathn... ⚠️ CVE-2025-39567: Improper Neutralization of Inp... 🟡 CVE-2025-39562: Improper Neutralization of Inp... 🟡 CVE-2025-39559: Missing Authorization vulnerab... ⚠️ CVE-2025-39558: Improper Neutralization of Inp... 🟡 CVE-2025-39554: Missing Authorization vulnerab... 🔥 CVE-2025-39551: Deserialization of Untrusted D... 🔥 CVE-2025-39550: Deserialization of Untrusted D... ⚠️ CVE-2025-39542: Incorrect Privilege Assignment... ⚠️ CVE-2025-39535: Authentication Bypass Using an... ⚠️ CVE-2025-39533: Missing Authorization vulnerab... ⚠️ CVE-2025-39532: Missing Authorization vulnerab... ⚠️ CVE-2025-39527: Deserialization of Untrusted D... ⚠️ CVE-2025-39526: Improper Control of Filename f... ⚠️ CVE-2025-39521: Improper Neutralization of Inp... ⚠️ CVE-2025-39519: Improper Neutralization of Inp... ⚠️ CVE-2025-39464: Improper Neutralization of Inp... ⚠️ CVE-2025-39462: Improper Control of Filename f... ⚠️ CVE-2025-39461: Improper Control of Filename f... 🟡 CVE-2025-39457: Missing Authorization vulnerab... 🟡 CVE-2025-39456: Missing Authorization vulnerab... ⚠️ CVE-2025-39455: Cross-Site Request Forgery (CS... 🟡 CVE-2025-39453: Cross-Site Request Forgery (CS... ⚠️ CVE-2025-39452: Improper Control of Filename f... 🟡 CVE-2025-39444: Improper Neutralization of Inp... 🟡 CVE-2025-39443: Cross-Site Request Forgery (CS... ⚠️ CVE-2025-39442: Cross-Site Request Forgery (CS... ⚠️ CVE-2025-39441: Cross-Site Request Forgery (CS... ⚠️ CVE-2025-39440: Cross-Site Request Forgery (CS... 🟡 CVE-2025-39439: Exposure of Sensitive System I... 🟡 CVE-2025-39438: Cross-Site Request Forgery (CS... 🟡 CVE-2025-39437: Cross-Site Request Forgery (CS... 🔥 CVE-2025-39436: Unrestricted Upload of File wi... ⚠️ CVE-2025-39435: Cross-Site Request Forgery (CS... 🟡 CVE-2025-39434: Authorization Bypass Through U... ⚠️ CVE-2025-39433: Cross-Site Request Forgery (CS... ⚠️ CVE-2025-39432: Improper Neutralization of Inp... ⚠️ CVE-2025-39431: Cross-Site Request Forgery (CS... ⚠️ CVE-2025-39430: Cross-Site Request Forgery (CS... ⚠️ CVE-2025-39429: Improper Control of Filename f... 🟡 CVE-2025-39428: Improper Neutralization of Inp... 🟡 CVE-2025-39427: Improper Neutralization of Inp... 🟡 CVE-2025-39426: Cross-Site Request Forgery (CS... 🟡 CVE-2025-39425: Cross-Site Request Forgery (CS... ⚠️ CVE-2025-39424: Cross-Site Request Forgery (CS... ⚠️ CVE-2025-39423: Cross-Site Request Forgery (CS... ⚠️ CVE-2025-39422: Cross-Site Request Forgery (CS... ⚠️ CVE-2025-39421: Cross-Site Request Forgery (CS... ⚠️ CVE-2025-39420: Improper Neutralization of Inp... ⚠️ CVE-2025-39419: Cross-Site Request Forgery (CS... ⚠️ CVE-2025-39418: Cross-Site Request Forgery (CS... ⚠️ CVE-2025-39417: Cross-Site Request Forgery (CS... ⚠️ CVE-2025-39416: Cross-Site Request Forgery (CS... ⚠️ CVE-2025-39415: Cross-Site Request Forgery (CS... ⚠️ CVE-2025-39414: Cross-Site Request Forgery (CS... ⚠️ CVE-2025-32686: Deserialization of Untrusted D... 🔥 CVE-2025-32682: Unrestricted Upload of File wi... ⚠️ CVE-2025-32674: Improper Neutralization of Inp... ⚠️ CVE-2025-32670: Improper Neutralization of Inp... ⚠️ CVE-2025-32666: Improper Neutralization of Inp...
LinkedIn Faces Lawsuit Over Private Messages Used for AI Training

LinkedIn Faces Lawsuit Over Alleged Use of Private Messages for AI Training

LinkedIn, the professional networking platform owned by Microsoft, is facing a class-action lawsuit filed in California. The lawsuit alleges that LinkedIn disclosed private messages from its Premium subscribers to third parties without obtaining proper consent, using this data to train generative artificial intelligence (AI) models.

According to the complaint, in August 2024, LinkedIn introduced a privacy setting that automatically opted Premium users into sharing their personal data for AI training purposes. This change was reportedly implemented without explicit user consent or adequate notification. Following public backlash, LinkedIn updated its privacy policy in September 2024 to include provisions for AI model training data usage. However, the lawsuit contends that this update was an attempt to conceal prior unauthorized data sharing.

The plaintiffs argue that LinkedIn's actions violate the Stored Communications Act, breach contractual agreements, and infringe upon California's competition laws. They are seeking damages of $1,000 per affected user, along with additional compensation for the alleged violations.

In response to the allegations, a LinkedIn spokesperson stated that the claims are false and without merit.

Additional Reading

Back to Posts